Become a Better Clinician with Scott Miller

How do we know if and when we’re getting better at what we do? It’s a seemingly simple question, but there are some fields—like psychotherapy—in which measuring progress and outcomes, and then applying that information to practice, is harder to do than in other fields. For example, in math, it’s pretty clear-cut—either the answer to a specific problem is right or wrong, although the process by which you get to the answer may differ. But when it comes to the mental health profession, how do we measure clinical mastery? How do we measure when we’re “right” and when we’re “wrong?” And is the process we use—the specific methods and techniques—significant or not?

Scott Miller, the founder of the International Center for Clinical Excellence, has been a driving force in applying the science of expertise to the practicalities of the consulting room. He coauthored a feature article on clinical excellence in our May 2011 issue, offered a session on the same topic in our webcast series on excellence, and will be presenting the luncheon address on Friday—“Charting Your Path to Clinical Excellence”—at the upcoming March Symposium.

Here are some of the questions he’ll be discussing in his luncheon keynote. Although there’s been a boom in resources on the field of psychotherapy during the last few decades, have individual therapists actually gotten better? Are we getting better as a field? How do we measure our progress as therapists and clients’ progress with their treatment goals? How do we then take what we’ve learned and apply it to becoming better therapists?

Hear Miller present in person to learn the answers to these important questions and much more. Want to hear even more details? He’ll also be presenting a workshop on Friday at Symposium 2012 to go more in-depth on the subject. Learning about Miller’s insights and applying these methods in your practice may forever change the way you work with clients and think about therapy.

02.14.2012   Posted In: Symposium 2012   By Jordan Magaziner
You must login to leave comment. Why?

  • Not available avatar Lark Eshleman 02.15.2012 14:30
    Miller's approach to guiding us in our practice is excellent! If we waited for "evidence-based" research to catch up with our doing what we know works, we would lose many people, especially in the intense child trauma work i do. Thanks for your clear and logical, reasonable leadership!
  • 0 avatar John Rowland 03.31.2017 13:04
    Rep Out On The Classics

    There's a period and a place to go overwhelming, and Steve knows it. In the NFL, he did his time with barbell control cleans, enormous seats, and soul-squashing squats. Of course, they'll all help construct muscle, But to look as solid as you seem to be, Steve additionally swears by fusing old fashioned bodyweight moves accomplished for a lot of reps.

    "Some of my most loved exercises have quite recently been bodyweight," he says. "Push-ups, sit-ups, pull-ups, lurches, bodyweight squats—there are a million diverse approaches to work distinctive muscle gatherings to disappointment. Because you hit disappointment at, say, 30 reps doesn't mean it's any less successful!"

    The science backs him up. While it's to some degree clear that high reps can deliver a genuine caloric consume, they can likewise help you include or keep muscle. A recent report analyzed the impacts of preparing at 25-35 reps as opposed to preparing with 6-8 reps. Both gatherings took their sets to disappointment. Shockingly, both gatherings picked up a similar measure of fit muscle, despite the fact that the heavier preparing bunch increased more quality. So the lesson for you: Do your push-ups, yet do them until you can't do any more!
You must login to leave comment. Why?
I do blog this IDoBlog Community